The sense of the present wrongness of the world inevitably leads the mind to ask after the right way would be. What should be?
One of the many things that is objectionable about making creation doctrine into a supposedly scientific theory about the world's beginnings--as has been happening again in our time under the impact of a shallow and reactionary "evangelicalism"--is that it detracts from this basic function of the Christian confession concerning creation. Creation is not a theory of how the world came to be--not a cosmogony...it's faith's confession concerns what came to be, and why.
When God saw what had been made, God found it to be very good (Gen 1:31). But things do not always seem "good." The world around us is generally not good. We humans missed it up, just as we continue to mess it up. God continues to create, even as we continue to destroy.
I understand some Christians disagree with me. For them, the biblical creation story is a cosmogony. What I don't understand is why Christians who think this way insist their religious view be taught in a science classroom. If you desire religion to be taught in public schools, then push for more religious studies courses. I actually think this would be a good thing.
Finally, the biggest problem I have with creationist interpretations of the biblical creation myths is that it encourages the "God of the gaps" phenomenon. "God of the gaps" is the reasoning model which concludes anything science can't explain must be God. For example, before scientific reasoning formalized the idea of gravity, "God of the gaps" reasoning would have concluded that apples fall from trees because God makes them fall.
Science continually seeks to understand more and more; the breadth of scientific knowledge expands constantly. If our view of God is limited to that which science can not explain (yet), God will progressively shrink as science progressively grows its sphere of explanation.

















